Inference APIs
Compare/Chat

GLM 5.3 vs GPT-4o mini

GLM 5.3 is an open-weight chat model you can call on this endpoint; GPT-4o mini is a closed model from OpenAI. Below: what each costs for three realistic workloads, the limits that apply, and when to choose which.

OpenAI figures are public list prices and documented limits, checked 2026-09-16 against the provider page. Inference APIs prices are read live from the price list.

Short answer
  • Cost: GPT-4o mini is cheaper in all three workloads, by 90–91%.
  • Limits: OpenAI: Rate limits scale with cumulative spend through usage tiers 1–5. Here: no per-minute or per-day caps.

Side by side

GLM 5.3GPT-4o mini
Served byInference APIsOpenAI
Model authorZ.aiOpenAI
Model idzai-org/GLM-5.3gpt-4o-mini
Input price$1.82 / 1M tokens$0.15 / 1M tokens
Output price$5.72 / 1M tokens$0.60 / 1M tokens
Context window1M tokens128K tokens
CapabilitiesChat, Reasoning, Tool calling, JSON modeChat, Vision, Tool calling, JSON mode
WeightsOpenClosed
StatusAvailableAvailable
LimitsNo per-minute or per-day request or token caps; usage draws on a prepaid balanceRate limits scale with cumulative spend through usage tiers 1–5.
Time to first token0.41 snot measured by us
Output speed170.6 tokens / snot measured by us

What three workloads cost

List prices applied to the same work. The cheaper side of each row is in bold.

WorkloadGLM 5.3GPT-4o miniDifference
Chat assistant — 10,000 turns of 800 tokens in, 300 out$31.72$3.0091%
Long prompts or RAG — 10,000 requests of 8,000 in, 500 out$174$15.0091%
Generation-heavy — 10,000 requests of 500 in, 2,000 out$124$12.7590%

GPT-4o mini is cheaper in all three workloads, by 90–91%. Reasoning models bill their thinking as output tokens, so real output counts run higher than the visible answer; treat the generation-heavy row as a floor for them.

When to choose which

Choose GLM 5.3 if
  • You need more than 128K tokens of context (it takes 1M)
  • You want open weights: the same model can be moved to another host or self-hosted later
  • Coding agents and long multi-step tasks where GLM 5.3 Flash runs out of depth
  • You want a large open-weight model with a 1M-token context, hosted in the United States
  • You want open weights, or the option to move the same model to another host
Choose GPT-4o mini if
  • You need to send images; GLM 5.3 is text-only
  • Cost is the deciding factor; it is cheaper in every workload above
  • You need image input
  • You are already on OpenAI and want one bill and one SDK default

Price, context and speed are measurable; answer quality on your task is not something a table can settle. Both take the same request, so the honest test is to run your own prompts through each.

Measured speed

Medians of three streamed runs on 2026-09-17, public endpoint, a prompt that asks for about 120 words. Time to first token is the first token of any kind, reasoning included; output speed counts every generated token from that point. Reasoning models then think before the visible answer starts: GLM 5.3 began answering after 6.22 s at default settings, which you can shorten with the reasoning controls on each model page. Expect ±30% with time of day. We did not measure OpenAI and do not quote other people's numbers; read "not measured" as unknown, not slow. Method and raw numbers: speed measurements.

Switching from OpenAI

Both speak the OpenAI wire format. The edit is the base URL, the key and the model id; then re-run your own prompts, because it is a different model.

Python · openai SDK
import os
from openai import OpenAI

# before: OpenAI
# client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.openai.com/v1", api_key=os.environ["OPENAI_API_KEY"])
# MODEL = "gpt-4o-mini"

# after: Inference APIs
client = OpenAI(base_url="https://api.inferenceapis.com/v1", api_key=os.environ["INFERENCE_API_KEY"])
MODEL = "zai-org/GLM-5.3"

resp = client.chat.completions.create(model=MODEL, messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}], max_tokens=500)

More detail, including Node, LangChain and LiteLLM: switching OpenAI-compatible providers.

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 or GPT-4o mini?

GPT-4o mini is cheaper in all three workloads, by 90–91%. The table above uses list prices: GLM 5.3 $1.82 / 1M tokens input, $5.72 / 1M tokens output; GPT-4o mini $0.15 / 1M tokens input, $0.60 / 1M tokens output.

Can I switch from GPT-4o mini to GLM 5.3 without rewriting code?

Yes, if you call it through an OpenAI-compatible client. Change the base URL to https://api.inferenceapis.com/v1, swap the API key, and set the model to zai-org/GLM-5.3. Because it is a different model, re-run your prompts and evaluations before moving production traffic.

What limits apply to GPT-4o mini?

Rate limits scale with cumulative spend through usage tiers 1–5. On Inference APIs there are no per-minute or per-day request or token caps; usage draws on a prepaid balance.

Why does GLM 5.3 use more output tokens than the visible answer?

It is a reasoning model: it thinks before it answers and the thinking is billed as output tokens. Budget for that in output-heavy workloads, and set max_tokens to a few hundred or more so the answer is not cut off.

Spotted a price or limit that has changed? Tell us and we will re-check the provider page.